NOTE: FDD pages are provided for informational purposes only. This is an overview of what is in the full document that must be given by the franchise to the potential franchisee – and whose receipt between the parties must be formally certified by a notary. If you are interested in getting in touch with a franchise, please consult our offers via the “Industry” pages accessible via the drop-down menu above. Territory granted: franchisees may only operate their business partnership on the sites on the call list (part of the distribution agreement). Before establishing a distributor`s call list, the franchisee conducts a survey of various of Matco`s previous distribution routes and potential new distribution routes in order to identify an appropriate call list containing at least 325 potential customers at the time of the distribution agreement, the location of which is indicated on the call list. The franchisee is not required to complete the call list with additional stops or potential customers if the number of potential customers decreases. If and for as long as the franchisees comply with the distribution agreement, the franchisee will not operate a Matco mobile distribution company or grant any license or operating franchise that is authorized to sell products to potential customers or actual customers indicated on the call list when those customers purchase products from or from companies on the call list. One difference seems to be that the rules applicable to traders with older agreements are different. That`s why we publish matco Tools Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDD) for 2010, 2011 and 2012. Manufacturers and franchisees who enter into contracts with distributors and franchisees in California should be aware of California labor laws. The PAGA, for example, allows a worker to take legal action on behalf of the state against his employer for violating the labor law, with most of the revenue going to the state.

The provisions of the Labour Code may invalidate the otherwise enforceable dispute settlement conditions of an agreement. Contact California franchises and distributors for advice on the impact of these laws on your business. The Ninth Court of Appeal dismissed Matco`s appeal. The Ninth Circle ruled that the arbitration clause was null and void because it inadmissiblely waived Fleming`s rights under the California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA). A clause in the agreement states that any provisions deemed illegal could be separated and that the rest of the agreement would remain in force. In view of the salvatorial clause, the ninth circle upheld the decision of the first instance to separate the unenforceable arbitration clause from the agreement. This allowed the CFRA`s anti-waiver provision to apply to the forum`s selection clause and allowed Fleming`s claims to remain in California.